Posted on

When Vanna White sued samsung for appropriation and under the Lanham Act, she won her case under California Answer

When Vanna White sued samsung for appropriation and under the Lanham Act, she won her case under California common law right of publicity claim and under the Lanham Act. List the eight sleekcraft factors that are required to prove a Lanham Act complaint.

 

The Lanham Act of 1946 is a federal law passed to afford businesses protection of their trademarks. This law is really a protection of a company’s goodwill. A trade mark becomes associated with that company and is used as a means of identifying that company’s goods or services. The Sleekcraft factors that are required to prove a Lanham Act compliant

(1) strength of the mark;

(2) proximity of the goods;

(3) similarity of the marks;

(4) evidence of actual confusion;

(5) marketing channels used;

(6) type of goods and the degree of care likely to be exercised by the purchaser;

(7) defendant’s intent in selecting the mark; and

(8) likelihood of expansion of the product lines.

 

(Found in Vanna White/Samsung case in lecture and taken from AMF, Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341, 348–9 (9th Cir. 1979).